Layers of Sedimentary Rock Deposited by Global Flood

This is definitely a legitimate question to ask concerning the nature of the
evidence one would expect to be left behind by the Flood cataclysm.
Because the waters of local floods today are often full of sediments and are
fast-moving, it is commonly thought that neat, uniform sediment layers are
not deposited under such conditions. So this question needs close examination,
starting by looking at what the evidence is that we see in the rock record.

Do We Find Neat Uniform Layers of Sedimentary Rock in the
Geologic Record?

Whether looking into the Grand Canyon from one of the rim overlooks
or traversing through the Grand Canyon on foot or by raft, the answer to this
question is obviously yes. The fossil-bearing sedimentary layers deposited by
the Flood can be seen exposed in the walls, stacked on top of one another like
a huge pile of pancakes. And the view is much the same no matter where one
views the Grand Canyon. So at the regional scale in the Grand Canyon area it
is clearly evident that the sedimentary rock layers deposited there during the
Flood cataclysm are neat and uniform.

Similar observations can be made in many other places across the earth’s
surface. This pattern is often seen in road cuts and in mountainous areas where erosion has exposed the constituent rock layer sequences. So it is hardly necessary
to defend the assertion that the fossil-bearing sedimentary layers that
were deposited during the Flood cataclysm are generally neat and uniform and
stacked in a sequence that is exposed to view in many places across the earth’s
continents.

The assertion that these fossil-bearing sedimentary layers were deposited
during the Flood cataclysm is easy to defend.1 The obvious observation to make
is that many of these fossil-bearing sedimentary layers contain fossils of creatures
that today live on the shallow ocean floors fringing the continents, and not
on the continents where countless billions of them are buried in these sedimentary
layers. Indeed, sedimentary rock layers containing the same fossils are not
found on the ocean floors today, nor are they found in comparable dimensions
on the continental shelves fringing the continents. But the vast marine-fossil-bearing
sedimentary layers we find spread right across the continents today are
thus consistent with the ocean waters having flooded over the continents on a
global scale, tearing marine creatures from their shallow ocean floor habitats
and picking up sediments, then burying those creatures in those sediments up
and across the continents in vast sedimentary layers. This is consistent with the
biblical description of the Flood.

Figure 1. An example of one of the charts produced during the AAPG project showing the
local strata columns in the central and southern Rockies region of the USA.

Many geologists are already aware that there are six thick sequences of fossil-bearing
sedimentary strata, known as megasequences, which can be traced right
across the North American continent. This was documented five decades ago
in 19632 and subsequently verified by numerous observations so that it is now
well recognized. In the early 1980s, the American Association of Petroleum
Geologists (AAPG) conducted a project in which all the local geologic strata
“columns” derived from the mapping of outcrops in local areas, supplemented
by drill-hole data, were put on charts to show the sequences of fossil-bearing
sedimentary rock layers right across the North American continent (figure 1).3

The rationale used to identify these megasequences was based on mapping
the preserved rock record across the North American continent. These thick
sequences or packages of fossil-bearing sedimentary rock layers were easily identified
because they were bounded by erosion surfaces (called unconformities) due to the actions of the ocean waters as they advanced over the continent
depositing the sedimentary rock layers before retreating again (figure 2).4 These
unconformities therefore coincide with rising and falling water levels as ocean
waters oscillated across the continent and back again after depositing their sediment
loads, often also coinciding with the mass burial of creatures in what
evolutionary geologists have called mass extinctions. Significantly, some of the
fossil-bearing sedimentary layers in these megasequences can also be traced
beyond North America to other continents.5

Figure 2. The preserved rock record, consisting of named megasequences, between major
unconformities and mass extinctions (arrowed) across the north American continent.

Within each megasequence are various named strata units. For example,
the first (lowermost) of these megasequences, called the Sauk Megasequence,
in the Grand Canyon area consists of the Tapeats Sandstone, the Bright Angel
Shale, and the Muav Limestone. Thorough geologic mapping was initially only
done locally, so the rock units identified and mapped were given names locally.
Therefore, even if a rock unit stretched into adjoining local areas and beyond, it
often had different names in adjoining local areas. Thus, in the 1980s, when the American Association for Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) tabulated all the local
strata columns across the continent, it became possible to see how some specific
rock units, which had been given different names in different local areas, actually
were the same unit, which could be traced vast distances across the continent.
The Tapeats Sandstone in the Grand Canyon area is one of those units,
and it can be traced all across Arizona northward to the Canadian border and
beyond, northeastward right across the USA as far as Maine (figure 3).6 The
same sandstone unit in exactly the same geologic strata position is also found
in southern Israel, from where it can be traced across to Jordan and into Egypt,
and then right across north Africa.7 Thus the Tapeats Sandstone represents one
unit within one megasequence that is easily identified over vast continental
scale areas due to its uniform makeup.

Figure 3. The distribution of the Tapeats Sandstone and its equivalents across North America, constructed from the local geologic columns compiled in the COSUNA charts produced by the AAPG.

However, while some units within megasequences traverse continents, many
others are only recognizable and able to be traced over regions, though still vast
in extent compared to one’s local area. In the Grand Canyon area, for example,
the Coconino Sandstone, within the fourth of the megasequences, known as
the Absaroka Megasequence, can be traced from northern and central Arizona across New Mexico into Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas over an area
approaching 200,000 square miles, though an isolated remanent in southwestern
Arizona indicates the unit previously had a wider distribution that has been
reduced by erosion (figure 4).

Nevertheless, not all the strata units are uniform, the character of the rock units changing due to later variations. For example, the Toroweap Formation is a limestone in the Grand Canyon area, but laterally to the southwest it changes into sandstone, along with local variations that include beds of gypsum to the west.9 Indeed, many strata units change their rock character laterally, reflecting both the type and composition of the sediments within the mixture carried by the ocean waters over the continent to deposit them. Furthermore, not only is the sediment composition related to the source of the sediments, but changes in the sediment composition can occur. As the ocean waters carried sediments up and across the continent, they sometimes eroded underlying sediment layers of different compositions, adding them to their sediment loads before eventually depositing them.

Another aspect of this question is the thickness of the fossil-bearing sedimentary rock layers deposited across the continents. Even on local scales, variations in the thicknesses of strata units can be seen, as well as sometimes even compositional changes. So, for example, even though the Coconino Sandstone averages a thickness of 315 feet in the Grand Canyon area, it changes its thickness through the length of the Grand Canyon, thinning to the west and thickening even up to 1,000 feet toward the southeast (see figure 4). Furthermore, some rock units are made up of beds of alternating compositions, such as within some of the strata units in the Cincinnati area which consist of alternating beds of limestone and shale (figure 5).10 Sometimes these thinner beds thicken and thin even within the outcrop scale of a road cut. So whereas we do find neat, uniform fossil-bearing sedimentary rock layers across the continents as a record of the Flood, the depositional processes produced and left behind local variations, both in thicknesses of the layers and beds within the named strata units, but also variations in compositions, from local to regional scales.

Were the Fast-Moving Flood Waters Also Churning?

During the Flood cataclysm, there were four main causes for generating the
surging flows of water currents that picked up and carried sediments onto and
across the continents to deposit the fossil-bearing sedimentary rock layers there.

First, there was the normal ebb and flow of the rising and falling tidal oscillations.
The effect of these approximately twice-daily tidal surges would have
increased as the Flood waters became global. It has been shown that on a global
ocean there would have been a resonating effect by which the tidal surges would
have progressively built in height and, therefore, in the strength and impact of
each surge, due to the close overlapping of the tidal peaks and troughs in the
approximate 12–13 hour spacing between successive highs and lows.11

Superimposed on those tidal flows and surges, there would have been
repeated tsunamis generated by earthquakes caused by repeated catastrophic
earth movements. The “fountains of the great deep” were broken up (Genesis 7:11), initiating the catastrophic plate tectonics that drove the Flood event.12
The earth’s crust was broken up around the globe, producing massive earthquakes,
followed by the accelerated motion of the crustal fragments (called
plates) across the earth’s surface at many-feet-per-second speed. As the Flood
event progressed, plates collided with one another, or some plates were pushed
under the edges of other plates. All these earth movements would have generated
many catastrophic earthquakes that in turn would have repeatedly produced
massive tsunamis. As these tsunamis moved, they would have surged
toward and onto the continents.

Furthermore, superimposed on the tides and tsunamis would have been
the progressive raising of the ocean floor. As the ocean floor plates were pushed
apart, molten rock rose from inside the earth to generate new ocean floor rocks.
The new warm ocean floor, being less dense, would steadily rise, thus pushing up the sea level. This raising of the sea level would have in turn caused a surge
of ocean waters toward the continents to flood them.

The net result would have been huge fluctuations in the water levels combined
with catastrophic surges of walls of water moving from open ocean areas
toward and onto the continents and across them. Yet another force at work driving
these surging water currents would have been super-storms. These would
have been generated in the atmosphere as a result of the supersonic steam jets
at the crustal fracture zones, catapulting ocean waters aloft before they fell back
to the earth’s surface as global torrential rainfall (the “windows or floodgates of
heaven” were opened, Genesis 7:11). It is estimated that such super-storms and
their winds moving across the surface of the Flood waters would have driven
water currents at speeds of 100 miles an hour or more.13

So there is no doubt that there were adequate mechanisms for driving fastmoving,
catastrophically powerful water currents and surges from the oceans
toward and onto the continents. These were thus capable of carrying the sediments
and creatures to be buried in the fossil-bearing sedimentary rock layers
deposited across the continents, stacked up in sequence as a result of the fluctuating
water levels and the ebb and flow of the water.

Just as is observed today, in the open ocean there are no major effects on the
ocean surface from the passage of tsunamis, tidal surges, and fast-moving water
currents apart from waves. It is at the base of the water column deep below the
surface where the moving and surging water picks up loose sediments from
the ocean floor, or scours and erodes sediments from the ocean floor, and then
transports them in a slurry of sediment-laden water.

What was happening at the base of the water column of these surging, fastmoving
water currents during the Flood would have depended on a number of
factors, which in turn would have produced differing results. Though somewhat
oversimplified, if the water was flowing over uneven ocean floor topography,
then turbulent flow (churning water) could be generated. But if the water was
flowing over a flat surface, then the flow would be laminar and sheet-like, and
any erosion would result from cavitation, a process in which the fast water
flow generates vacuum bubbles that hammer rock surfaces, pulverizing the rock
rapidly. If there were loose sediments on the surface being traversed, once the water reached a critical speed it would pick up those loose sediments and carry
them. Often, once the process is started, if there is even the slightest of downward
slopes on the surfaces being traversed, then gravity takes over to produce
debris flows. Many strata units in the rock record bear testimony to having been
deposited by gravity-driven underwater debris flows.

The quantity and type of sediments transported would depend on the composition
and particle sizes in those loose sediments, so that generally the faster
the water flow, the greater the sizes of the particles that could be picked up and
transported. Below a critical speed, no sediments would be picked up and carried
by the water flows. And that critical speed would likely be lower for turbulent
flow and higher for laminar flow, except where gravity is driving the water’s
ability to pick up sediments to produce debris flows. At higher speeds and carrying
more sediment, the water at the base of the water column would become
more erosive. The more sediments the water carried, the more they would add
to the water’s abrasive and erosive power. At the highest water speeds though,
when the amount of sediment in the water is greater than the amount of water
in the slurry mixture, the density of the slurry is so great that even boulders are transported, suspended in the slurry.

Fast-moving waters are certainly capable of depositing sediments, and many
strata layers in the rock record of the Flood would have been deposited in that
way, as witnessed by the strata layers that were deposited right across continents.
Additionally, once the water started to slow down in its passage over the continents,
the water would start to drop the rest of its sediment load and deposit
it in more sediment layers, also burying the creatures that had been carried by
the water. An example is the postulated progressive simultaneous deposition of
the Tapeats Sandstone, Bright Angel Shale, and Muav Limestone across Nevada,
Arizona, and New Mexico as the Flood waters advanced, the bottom current
speed decreasing in the returning underflow so sediments of decreasing grain sizes were progressively deposited.14 As the water slowed it would also be less likely to erode previously deposited sediment layers, especially where the surface of those previously deposited sediment layers had started to cohere, and cementation had begun to bind the sediment particles (the first stage of the hardening process).

The net result would be that the Flood waters at the base of the flow would
tend to erode in source areas as the current flow increased, and then started
switching to depositional mode as the water currents flowed over the continents
and started to deposit their loads. Thus, when the water currents subsequently slowed as they continued further sediment deposition, they would not be eroding
at the same time. The outcome would be to deposit uniform sediment layers
during their passage across the continents as they progressively spread out and
deposited their sediment loads. Of course, there could be lateral variations in sediment
types. Sometimes as the waters slowed, the heavier particles would settle
out first. Then at slower speeds finer particles would be deposited, so that the
sediment particle sizes could change laterally as the one rock unit was deposited
across the continent. In some strata layers the grading of the sediment particle
sizes is the inverse. But many layers do not exhibit any graded bedding. Instead,
the changes between water flow surges meant changes in sediment loads, with
sediments of different compositions and types, each consisting of uniform similar
particle sizes being deposited, such as lime mud versus quartz sand, as in the
example of the Toroweap Formation in the Grand Canyon area being deposited
on top of the Coconino Sandstone, as has already been mentioned.

Natural and Experimental Examples

In 1960, Hurricane Donna created surging ocean waves that flooded inland
up to five miles along the coast of southern Florida for six hours.15 As a result, the
hurricane deposited a neat, uniform six-inch-thick mud layer, with numerous
thin laminae within it, across the area traversed by the flood waters. In June
1965, a storm in Colorado produced flooding of Bijou Creek, which resulted in
the deposition from the fast-moving waters of new sediment layers containing
fine laminations.16 Then on June 12, 1980, an eruption of Mount St. Helens
produced a hurricane-velocity, surging-flow of volcanic ash, which accumulated
in less than five hours as a neat, uniform 25-foot-thick layer of laminated
volcanic ash, including uniform neat, alternating laminae of coarse and fine
sediment grains (figure 6).17

Figure 6. The 25-foot-thick deposit is exposed in the middle of the cliff. The fine layering within this deposit was produced within hours at Mount St. Helens on June 12, 1980, by hurricane-velocity surging flows from the crater of the volcano. (Photograph: Steven A. Austin)

In a detailed study of a seven-foot-thick bed within the Redwall Limestone
in the Grand Canyon area, Austin18 has convincingly argued that the evidence is consistent with the bed’s deposition by a gravity-driven debris flow. In the
middle section of this bed, which has been traced over more than 11,600 square
miles, are billions of straight-shelled nautiloid fossils of various lengths. Though
mostly buried and fossilized horizontally, some are found at various angles, and
some are even vertical. These and the ubiquitous vertical fluid evulsion structures
are consistent with rapid burial in a debris flow that turbulently tossed
some of the nautiloids around during this mass kill event. Yet the bed overall is
neat and uniform over this large area.

The three observed examples described above demonstrate that local-regional
natural catastrophes do deposit neat, uniform sedimentary rock layers,
even though in most instances the flow of water and air respectively was rapid
and sometimes turbulent (churning). It should also be noticed that in two of
the three examples the surging, fast-moving sediment-laden flows did not erode
into the surfaces they flowed over, even though those surfaces consisted of loose
materials (soils and sands, and previously deposited volcanic ash, respectively).
Instead, the flows left smooth, neat, uniform boundaries at the bases of the
neat, uniform sediment layers they deposited. These sediment layers resulting from these local-regional natural catastrophes closely mirror at a smaller scale
the neat, uniform sedimentary layers left behind by the Flood waters, stacked up
neatly on top of one another with smooth, uniform boundaries between them.

Not only do we have numerous modern examples where local-regional natural
catastrophic events have resulted in the rapid accumulation of neat uniform
sedimentary layers, but we have numerous laboratory experiments that have
allowed researchers to document the same processes. For example, using a circular
flume, it was demonstrated that high-velocity water currents sort and deposit
sediment grains by weight, density, and shape, and that as the fast-moving current loses its velocity, the segregation of grains produces a succession of thin, parallel
laminae in the resultant neat uniform sediment layer.19 Other linear flume
experiments with water swiftly carrying sand grains have demonstrated how a
neat uniform sand layer is progressively deposited as the sand-carrying water
current advances.20 These examples demonstrate that water moving at upper
(high) flow regime speeds produces planar beds rapidly. Indeed, the results of
such flume experiments correlate closely with the observed natural sedimentation
processes from swift-flowing water in tidal channels, floods, and other
catastrophic events, and also accurately replicate at a smaller scale the features seen in the neat uniform sedimentary rock layers preserved in the continental geologic record.

The difference between the flume experiments and the observed local-regional
natural catastrophes on the one hand, and between the observed local-regional
natural catastrophes and the global Flood cataclysm on the other, is
in both instances the scale of the sedimentation. However, it is a progressive
increase in scale from the flume experiments to the observed local-regional natural catastrophes, and then to the scale of the global cataclysmic Flood. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that both the flume experiments and the local-regional natural catastrophes produce neat, uniform sediment layers by deposition from the laminar (sheet) flow of fast-moving waters, rather than from turbulent (churning) flow. Thus, because the continental-scale sedimentary rock layers deposited during the Flood cataclysm are neatly uniform across the continents, it is evident that even under global cataclysmic Flood conditions it was the laminar flow of fast-moving waters, and not turbulent or churning waters, that were responsible for the deposition of these neat, uniform sedimentary
rock layers.

Conclusion

In answer to the question that was posed, namely, how could neat uniform
sedimentary rock layers be deposited during the Flood cataclysm with all the
fast-moving waters, we have seen that the observed sedimentation processes
in both flume experiments and larger scale (local-regional) natural catastrophes
result in neat, uniform sediment layers being deposited from fast laminar
(sheet)-flowing waters. Thus it has been argued that the observed neat, uniform
sedimentary rock layers found deposited across the continents as a result of the
global Flood cataclysm can be envisaged to have also been the result of the same
sedimentation processes from similarly fast laminar-flowing waters. In other
words, we can confidently extrapolate the orders of magnitude to the enormous
scale of the global Flood cataclysm. Though the flume experiments have
been conducted at various small scales, the orders of magnitude extrapolation
to the observed natural catastrophes over large regions still results in the same
observed pattern of uniform sediment layers deposited neatly in succession by
fast-moving waters. This makes us confident that at the global scale of the Flood
cataclysm the same sedimentation processes would have also been responsible
for the neat, uniform sedimentary rock layers we observe to have been stacked
on top of one another and preserved in the continental geologic record, even
though the Flood waters were often fast-moving.

SourceThis article originally appeared on answersingenesis.org

Views: 17